Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc. v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex. July 27, 2020)

Denied Daubert motions to exclude defendant's damages expert denied
Daubert / Expert Challenges Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
Nos. 2:19-cv-00070-JRG-RSP, 2:19-cv-00071-JRG-RSP
Decided
July 27, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 227 SEALED MOTION to Exclude Portions of Expert Testimony Pursuant to Daubert filed by GREE, INC
Length
7 pages

Editorial Summary

AI-assisted editorial summary; not attorney-reviewed. Verify against the opinion itself before relying on any characterization of the holding.

GREE moved in two related cases to exclude portions of the expert testimony of Supercell's damages expert, Mr. Bakewell, who opined that in a hypothetical negotiation the parties would have agreed to a lump-sum royalty rather than the running royalty proposed by GREE's expert, Dr. Becker. Mr. Bakewell relied in part on license agreements produced by GREE. Judge Payne found the challenges went to weight rather than admissibility and denied both motions.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case