Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. May 20, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 181
Decided
May 20, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 156 SEALED MOTION Defendant Supercell Oy's Motion to Compel Discovery and Depositions filed by SUPERCELL OY, 152 Opposed SEALED MOTION for Relief in View of Governmental/Public Health Restrictions in Response to Covid-19…
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two motions: Motion for Relief in View of Governmental/Public Health Restrictions in Response to COVID-19 Virus Impact (“Motion for Relief”), Dkt. No. 152, and Motion to Compel Discovery and Depositions (“Motion to Compel), Dkt. No. 156, filed by Defendant Supercell Oy. After consideration, the Court denies both motions. Both Supercell and Plaintiff GREE, Inc. are in the video game industry, with GREE based in Japan and Supercell based in Finland.