GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 24, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

. Defendant Supercell OY (“Supercell”) previously filed two Motions to Dismiss. (Dkt. Nos. 17 & 97.)1 Within th ese Motions to Dismiss, Supercell argued that the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit were invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because the claims within the asserted patents were each directed to an abstract idea and because the claims do not recite any inventive concept. (Dkt. No. 17 & 97.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 102) to address Supercell’s Motion s to Dismi ss.