Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2020)

Denied
Summary Judgment Non-Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 399
Decided
August 21, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 335 Report and Recommendations re 196 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,774,655, filed by SUPERCELL OY
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Supercell filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,774,655. (Dkt. No. 196). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 335), recommending denial of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 353) to the Report and Recommendation, with Plaintiff GREE, Inc. filing a Response. (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case