GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. July 2, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Leave to Amend P.R. 3- 3 Invalidity Contentions (“Motion”), filed by Defendant Supercell Oy (“Supercell”). Dkt. No. 142. Supercell seeks leave to amend its invalidity contentions to add a prior art reference discovered during a search occurring near the end of fact discovery. After consideration, the Court DENIES Supercell’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff GREE, Inc. (“GREE”) and Supercell have been engaged in a series of litigations in this Court for over a year . As part of this series, GREE asserted U.S. Patent Nos.