Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 5, 2020)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 365
Decided
August 5, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 207 SEALED MOTION to Strike Portion of Expert Reports Regarding Claim Construction (as Corrected with proper certification) filed by GREE, INC
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff GREE, Inc.’s (“GREE”) Motion to Strike Portion of Expert Reports of José Zagal and Stacy Friedman Regarding Improper Claim Construction (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 207. GREE’s Motion seeks to strike some of Dr. José Zagal’s (“Dr. Zagal”) opinions in the Rebuttal Expert Report of José Zagal (“Zagal Rebuttal Report”) regarding the terms “touch operation,” “shooting effective range,” and “display data” as well as Mr. Stacy Friedman’s (“Mr.