Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 25, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Strike Discovery Contentions
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 414
Decided
August 25, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER - the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs Objections Dkt. No. 374 andDefendants Objections Dkt. No. 377 and ADOPTS Judge Paynes Memorandum OrderDkt. No. 354
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff GREE, Inc. previously filed a Motion to Strike Untimely Disclosed Facts and Opinions Regarding Non-Infringing Alternatives, Fact Witnesses, and Good-Faith Belief Defense (Dkt. No. 201). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Memorandum Order (Dkt. No. 354), granting- in-part and denying -in-part Plaintiff ’s Motion to Strike. Plaintiff and Defendant have filed Objections to the Memorandum Order (Dkt. Nos. 374, 377 , respectively ) and Responses (Dkt. Nos. 412, 408, respectively).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case