Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 460
Decided
September 9, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 355 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Supercell Oy previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,604,137 and 9,956,481. (Dkt. No. 200.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 355) , recommending denial of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff and Defendant have filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. Nos. 375, 379/395, respectively) and Responses (Dkt. Nos. 410, 415, respectively).