Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Daubert / Expert Challenges Motion to Strike Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 406
Decided
August 24, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER - the Court OVERRULES Defendants Objections Dkt. No. 363 andADOPTS Judge Paynes Memorandum Order Dkt. No. 346
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Supercell Oy (“Defendant”) previously filed a Motion to Strike the Testimony of GREE Inc.’s Technical Expert, Dr. Robert Akl, Relating to Improper Claim Constructions. (Dkt. No. 205.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Memorandum Order (Dkt. No. 346), den ying Defendant’s Motion to Strike. Defendant ha s now filed O bjections (Dkt. No. 363) to the Memorandum Order, with Plaintiff GREE, Inc. filing a Response. (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case