GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. July 26, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff GREE, Inc.’s (“GREE”) Motion to Strike Untimely Disclosed Facts and Opinions Regarding Non- Infringing Alternatives, Fact Witnesses, and Good- Faith Belief Defense (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 201). Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that it should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 27, 2019, GREE filed a Complaint for patent infringement against Supercell Oy (“Supercell”) alleging that Supercell infringes U.S. Patent Nos.