Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2020)

Denied
Summary Judgment Non-Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 400
Decided
August 21, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 342 Report and Recommendations re for 193 Sealed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No DirectInfringement of Certain Method, Systems, and Apparatus Claims filed by SUPERCELL OY
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Supercell filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Direct Infringement of Certain Method, Systems, and Apparatus Claims. (Dkt. No. 193.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 342), recommending denial of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 364), with Plaintiff GREE, Inc. filing a Response. (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case