Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 455
Decided
September 9, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 366 Report and Recommendations
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Supercell Oy previously filed its Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Failure to Claim Patent -Eligible Subject Matter Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. No. 197). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 366), denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment . Defendant has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 398) and Plaintiff GREE, Inc. has filed a Response (Dkt. No. 443). Defendant also filed a Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 381), which Judge Payne also denied (Dkt. No. 437).