Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. July 20, 2020)

Denied
Motion to Strike Claim Construction Daubert / Expert Challenges
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 346
Decided
July 20, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Supercell Oy’s (“Supercell”) Motion to Strike the Testimony of GREE, Inc.’s Technical Expert, Dr. Robert Akl, Relating to Improper Claim Constructions (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 205. Supercell’s Motion seeks to strike Dr. Robert Akl’s opinions in Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Robert Akl, D.Sc. Regarding Validity of United States Patent Nos. 9,604,137; 9,956,481; 9,774,655; and 9,795,873 (“Akl Rebuttal Report”) regarding the term “shooting effective range”.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case