Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Daubert / Expert Challenges Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 405
Decided
August 24, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER - the Court OVERRULES Defendants Objections Dkt. No. 362 andADOPTS Judge Paynes Memorandum Order Dkt. No. 343
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Supercell (“Defendant”) previously filed Motion to Exclude the Testimony of GREE, Inc.’s Damages Expert, Stephen Becker. (Dkt. No. 198.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Memorandum Order (Dkt. No. 343), denying Defendant’s Motion to Exclude. Defendant ha s now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 362) to the Memorandum Order, with Plaintiff GREE, Inc. filing a Response. (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case