Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00070 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 25, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Daubert / Expert Challenges
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00070, Dkt. No. 413
Decided
August 25, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER - the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs Objections Dkt. No. 378 andADOPTS Judge Paynes Memorandum Order Dkt. No. 357
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff GREE, Inc. previously filed a Motion to Exclude Portions of Expert Testimony Pursuant to Daubert (Dkt. No. 199). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Memorandum O rder (Dkt. No. 357), granting-in-part as modified and denying-in-part Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude. Plaintiff has filed Objections (Dkt. No. 378) to the Memorandum Order, with Defendant Supercell Oy filing a Response. (Dkt. No. 409).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case