Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 18, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:07-cv-00109, Dkt. No. 443
Decided
February 18, 2009
Judge
Richard A. Schell, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 369 Sealed Motion to Strike
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE Before the court are the following: 1. Plaintiff Raytheon Company’s Motion to Strike Transcript Errata Sheets of Jonathan Knauth and Vu Linh Nguyen (de # 369); 2. Opposition to P laintiff R aytheon Com pany’s Mo tion to Str ike Tr anscript E rrata Sheets of Jonathan Knauth and Vu Linh Nguyen (de # 381); 3. Plaintiff Raytheon Company’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike Errata Sheets of Knauth and Nguyen (de # 395); and 4.