Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 18, 2009)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE Before the court are the following: 1. Plaintiff Raytheon Company’s Motion to Strike Transcript Errata Sheets of Jonathan Knauth and Vu Linh Nguyen (de # 369); 2. Opposition to P laintiff R aytheon Com pany’s Mo tion to Str ike Tr anscript E rrata Sheets of Jonathan Knauth and Vu Linh Nguyen (de # 381); 3. Plaintiff Raytheon Company’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike Errata Sheets of Knauth and Nguyen (de # 395); and 4.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error