Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 25, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:07-cv-00109, Dkt. No. 462
Decided
August 25, 2009
Judge
Richard A. Schell, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING AS MOOT IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 355 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Before the court are the following: 1. Plaintiff Raytheon Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Affirmative Defenses and Brief in Support (de # 355); 2. Defendants’ Re sponse to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Su mmary J udgment Regarding Affirmative Defenses and Brief in Support (de # 390); 3. Raytheon’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Affirmative Defenses (de # 400); and 4.