Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. June 23, 2008)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO QUASH Before the c ourt a re the “ Plaintiff’s E mergency Mo tion to Qu ash and Objection to Defendants’ Notice of Serving 23 Third-Party Subpoenas” (de # 243) and the Defendants’ Response (de # 244) thereto. Having considered the Motion, the briefing and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that the Plaintiff’s Motion should be DENIED. In its Motion, Raytheon, the Plaintiff, requests that the court quash twenty-three third party subpoenas setting depositions for the week of June 23-27, 2008.