Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:07-cv-00109, Dkt. No. 746
Decided
September 30, 2014
Judge
Richard A. Schell, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 655 - Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Daniel J. Slottje, and any Testimony or Evidence Related Thereto
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN OPINIONS OF DANIEL J. SLOTTJE, AND ANY TESTIMONY OR EVIDENCE RELATED THERETO The following are pending before the court: 1. Plaintiff R aytheon C ompany’s m otion t o e xclude c ertain o pinions o f D aniel J. Slottje, and any testimony or evidence related thereto (docket entry #655); 2. Sealed appendix in support of P laintiff Raytheon Company’s motion to ex clude certain opinions of Daniel J. Slottje, and any testimony or evidence related thereto (docket entry #656); 3.