Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2008)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE Before the court is “Plainti ff Raytheon Company’s Motion to S trike Certain Affirmative Defenses” (de # 336) and a Response (de # 344) and Reply (de # 346) thereto. I n its Moti on, Raytheon asks th e court to strike six aff irmative def enses f rom the “D efendants’ Answe r and Counterclaims to Plaintiff’s Second Am ended Complaint” (de # 315). The parties agree that the Defendants Sixth and Seventh affirmative defenses should be stricken. (Def’s. Resp.