Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 18, 2009)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:07-cv-00109, Dkt. No. 442
Decided
February 18, 2009
Judge
Richard A. Schell, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 367 SEALED MOTION to Exclude Proposed Rebuttal report and Expert Testimony of Art Simmons Regarding Trade Secret Issues filed by Raytheon Company
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE PROPOSED REBUTTAL REPORT OF ART SIMMONS Before the court are the following: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Proposed Rebuttal Report and Expert Testimony of Art Simmons Regarding Trade Secret Issues (de # 367); 2. Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Proposed Rebuttal Report and Expert Testimony of Art Simmons Regarding Trade Secret Issues (de # 386); 3.