Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2008)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL Before the court are the following: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Compel Discovery Regarding Misappropriation and Damages (de # 295); 2. Plaintiff’s Response to Def endants’ Motion t o Compel Discovery Reg arding Misappropriation and Damages (de # 309); 3. Reply in Support of Defe ndants’ Motion to Compe l Discovery Reg arding Misappropriation and Damages (de # 314); and 4. Plaintiff’s Sur-re ply to Defe ndants’ Motion to Compel Discovery Reg arding Misappropriation and Damages (de # 318).
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error