Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2008)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:07-cv-00109, Dkt. No. 406
Decided
December 23, 2008
Judge
Richard A. Schell, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 295 Defendants' Motion to Compel Discovery Regarding Misappropriation and Damages
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL Before the court are the following: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Compel Discovery Regarding Misappropriation and Damages (de # 295); 2. Plaintiff’s Response to Def endants’ Motion t o Compel Discovery Reg arding Misappropriation and Damages (de # 309); 3. Reply in Support of Defe ndants’ Motion to Compe l Discovery Reg arding Misappropriation and Damages (de # 314); and 4. Plaintiff’s Sur-re ply to Defe ndants’ Motion to Compel Discovery Reg arding Misappropriation and Damages (de # 318).