Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 14, 2008)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:07-cv-00109, Dkt. No. 303
Decided
August 14, 2008
Judge
Richard A. Schell, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER GRANTING DKT 217 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Before the court are the following: 1. Plaintiff’s Mo tion f or L eave to F ile Se cond A mended Co mplaint a nd B rief i n Support (de # 217); 2. Defendants’ Amended Opposition to P laintiff’s Motion for L eave to File Second Amended Complaint (de # 222); 3. Plaintiff’s R eply in Support of its Moti on for L eave to File Second A mended Complaint (de # 225); and 4. Defendants’ Surreply to Plaintiff’ s Motion for Leave to F ile Second A mended Complaint (de # 226).