Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2008)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PATENT INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS Before the cour t is the Pl aintiff’s “Motion for Leave to Supplement Patent Infringement Contentions” (Dkt. 276) and br iefing filed in response . Having considere d the Motion, the arguments of the parties and the relevant legal principles, the court is of the opinion that the Motion should be DENIED. In this la wsuit, f iled in M arch o f 2 007, Ra ytheon a sserts a myriad o f c laims in cluding infringement of four patents.