Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 18, 2009)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:07-cv-00109, Dkt. No. 444
Decided
February 18, 2009
Judge
Richard A. Schell, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 374 SEALED MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Supplement to the Expert Report of Roger Holcombe and Robert Ginn filed by Indigo Systems Corporation, Flir Systems Incorporated
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE Before the court are the following: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Supplement to the Expert Report of Roger Holcombe and Robert Ginn (de # 374); 2. Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Supplement to the Expert Report of Roger Holcombe and Robert Ginn (de # 392); 3. Defendants’ Reply in Support of their Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Supplement to the Expert Report of Roger Holcombe and Robert Ginn (de # 403); and 4.