Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 23, 2008)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:07-cv-00109, Dkt. No. 337
Decided
September 23, 2008
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PROTECTION re 319 First SEALED MOTION for Protection filed by Raytheon Company. "...Based on the foregoing, the court is of the opinion that Raytheons Motion for Protection Regarding Notices of Deposition…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTION Before the court are “Raytheon’s Motion for Protection Regarding Notices of Deposition [for] Steve Black, Stefan Baur and Rich Mullins” (de # 319) and the Defendants’ Response (de # 334) thereto. In its Motion, Raytheon asks the court to quash three subpoenas issued to the witnesses referred to above. Each of the witnesse s is employed by Raytheon and has been deposed by the Defendants as a fa ct witness.