Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 23, 2008)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTION Before the court are “Raytheon’s Motion for Protection Regarding Notices of Deposition [for] Steve Black, Stefan Baur and Rich Mullins” (de # 319) and the Defendants’ Response (de # 334) thereto. In its Motion, Raytheon asks the court to quash three subpoenas issued to the witnesses referred to above. Each of the witnesse s is employed by Raytheon and has been deposed by the Defendants as a fa ct witness.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error