Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation et al, No. 4:07-cv-00109 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2014)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:07-cv-00109, Dkt. No. 744
Decided
September 30, 2014
Judge
Richard A. Schell, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING INPART 649 Plaintiff's Motion for Application of California Law
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPLICATION OF CALIFORNIA LAW The following are pending before the court: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for application of California law (docket entry #649); 2. Appendix to Raytheon’s motion for application of California law (docket entry #650- sealed); 3. Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s motion for application of California law (docket entry #677); 4. Plaintiff’s reply in support of motion for application of California law (docket entry #701); and 5.