Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pictiva Displays International Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00495 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00495, Dkt. No. 525
Decided
October 20, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 244 Sealed Motion to Strike Certain Portions of the Expert Report
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Certain Portions of the Expert Report of M. Ray Perryman, Ph.D. (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiffs Pictiva Displays International Ltd. and Key Patent Innovations Ltd. (Dkt. No. 244) (collectively “Pictiva”). In the Motion, Pictiva moves to strike certain portions of Dr. Perryman’s report . ( Id. at 1) . Having considered the Motion and its related briefing, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that it should be GRANTED only IN PART. I.