Pictiva Displays International Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00495 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 27, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiffs Pictiva Displays International Ltd. and Key Patent Innovations Limited (“Plaintiffs”) previously filed several dispositive motions in the above -captioned case: a Motion for Summary Judgment that Pagano is Not Prior Art (“Pagano Motion”) (Dkt. No. 245); a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Samsung’s Marking Defense (“Marking Motion”) (Dkt. No. 248); a Motion for Summary Judgment on Samsung’s Affirmative Defenses (“Defenses Motion”) (Dkt. No. 241); and a Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Clix2 (“Clix2 Motion”) (Dkt. No. 251).