Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pictiva Displays International Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00495 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 22, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00495, Dkt. No. 534
Decided
October 22, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER 243 Sealed Motion to Strike
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs Pictiva Displays International Ltd. and Key Patent Innovations Limited’s Motion to Strike Certain Opinions of Samsung’s Expert Dr. Ioannis Kymissis. Dkt. No. 243. The Motion is fully briefed. See Dkt. Nos. 284, 322, 395. In the Motion, Plaintiffs argue, inter alia , that the Court should exclude the opinions of Samsung’s technical expert, Dr. Kymissis, under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and its progeny.