Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pictiva Displays International Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00495 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00495, Dkt. No. 521
Decided
October 20, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Certain Opinions of Samsung’s Expert Seth Miller, Ph.D., filed by Plaintiffs Pictiva Displays International Ltd. and Key Patent Innovations Limited. Dkt. No. 249. In the Motion, Plaintiffs move to strike certain portions of Dr. Miller’s opening and rebuttal reports. Id. at 1. Having considered the Motion and its related briefing, and for the reasons set forth below, the Motion is denied. I.