Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pictiva Displays International Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00495 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 22, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00495, Dkt. No. 533
Decided
October 22, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER 237 Sealed Motion to Strike and Exclude
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the the Motion to Strike and Exclude the Testimony and Opinions of Plaintiffs’ Damages Expert David Kennedy (Dkt. No. 237) filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. In the Motion, Samsung asks the Court to strike certain portions of Mr. Kennedy’s report . (Id. at 1). Having considered the Motion and its related briefing, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that it should be GRANTED only IN PART. I.