Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pictiva Displays International Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00495 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00495, Dkt. No. 503
Decided
October 2, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting 473 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN T HE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PICTIVA DISPLAYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. and KEY PATENT INNOVATIONS LIMITED, Pla intiffs, v. SAM SUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., De fendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § CAS E NO. 2:23-CV-00495-JRG-RSP ORDE R Defendants Sam sung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) previously filed a Renewed Rule 12(b )(1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Constitutional Standing (“Motion”) (Dkt. No.