Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pictiva Displays International Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00495 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00495, Dkt. No. 522
Decided
October 20, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 247 Sealed Motion
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs Pictiva Displays International Ltd. and Key Patent Innovations Limited’s Motion to Strike the Expert Report of Dr. Homer Antoniadis. Dkt. No. 247. The Motion is fully briefed. See Dkt. Nos. 291, 319-1, 352. In the Motion, Plaintiffs argue , inter alia, that the Court should exclude the opinions of Samsung’s technical expert, D r. Antoniadis, a former OSRAM employee , under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and its progeny.