Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pictiva Displays International Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00495 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2025)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00495, Dkt. No. 553
Decided
October 26, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 502505506
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”) previously filed several case- dispositive motions in the above -captioned case: a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Certain Accused Products (“Products Motion”) (Dkt. No. 236); a Motion for Summary Judgment of Failure to Mark Under 35 U.S.C. § 287 and No Pre-Notice Damages (“Marking Motion”) (Dkt. No. 242); and a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement of Plaintiffs’ Asserted Patents (“Willfulness Motion”) (Dkt. No.