Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. May 15, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 525
Decided
May 15, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 278 SEALED MOTION Motion to Exclude Portions of Jim W. Bergman's Opinions Regarding Damages filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. (Motion(s)278 terminated)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Palo Alto Networks, Inc.’s Motion to Exclude to Exclude Portions of Jim W. Bergman’s Opinions R egarding Damages (Dkt. No. 278). After consideration, the Court DENIES the motion as provided below. I. APPLICABLE LAW An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony…