Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 601
Decided
August 9, 2024
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 576 SEALED MOTION TO STRIKE THE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT OF JIM BERGMAN filed by Fortinet, Inc., 575 SEALED MOTION Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Certain Testimony by Fortinet Damages Expert Ms. Ambreen Salters fi…
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Ms. Salters ’ Supplemental Report (Dkt. No. 575) and Fortinet’s Motion to Strike the Second Supplemental R eport of Mr. Bergman (Dkt. No. 576). After consideration, the Court GRANTS the motions as provided below. I. BACKGROUND Both parties served supplemental damages expert reports and now both parties oppose those supplemental report s. Fortinet’s supplemental report seeks to address the settlement agreement entered into by Lionra with co-defendant Cisco late in this case.