Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2023)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 136
Decided
August 22, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 102 Opposed MOTION for leave to amend infringement contentions for Defendant Fortinet, Inc. filed by Lionra Technologies Limited
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions for Defendant Fortinet, Inc. Dkt. No. 102. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Lionra Technologies Limited filed its Complaint on August 19, 2022, against Fortinet, Inc. asserting , among others, U.S. Patent No. 7,302,708 (“the ’708 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7, 921, 323 (“the ’323 patent”). Relevant to this motion is the operative Docket Control Order, Dkt. No.