Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 2024)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 479
Decided
April 23, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 254 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment of Limitation on Damages filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc., 264 SEALED MOTION for Partial Summary Judgement as to Cisco's License Defense and Noninfringement with Respect …
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendant Palo Alto Networks, Inc.’s ( “PAN”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Limitation on Damages (Dkt. No. 254); Defendant Fortinet, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding License, or in the Alternative, Non-infringement (Dkt. No. 261); and Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Cisco’s License Defense and Noninfringement with respect to patent Nos. 7,685,436 and 8,566,612 (Dkt. No. 264).