Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. May 21, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 530
Decided
May 21, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 512 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF RELEASE OF CLAIMS filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. (Motion(s)512 terminated)
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Palo Alto Networks, Inc.’s Motion For Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment of Release of Claims (Dkt. No. 512). After consideration, the Court GRANTS AS MODIFIED the motion as provided below. PAN requests leave from the Court to file a summary judgment motion after the deadline for dispositive motions regarding a License Agreement entered into between Lionra and one of PAN’s suppliers. (Mot. at 1.) The Agreement was entered into on February 23, 2024 and produced April 11, 2024. (Id.) PAN moved for leave May 10, 2024.