Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. May 15, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 524
Decided
May 15, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
(NKL)MEMORANDUM ORDER re 277 SEALED MOTION to Exclude Non-Infringing Alternatives Testimony of Dr. Smith Under Daubert filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. (Motion(s)277 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Palo Alto Networks, Inc.’s Motion to Exclude Non- Infringing Alternatives Testimony of Dr. Smith under Daubert (Dkt. No. 277). After consideration, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion as provided below. I. APPLICABLE LAW An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or…