Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2024)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Summary Judgment § 101 Eligibility Non-Infringement License / Exhaustion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 609
Decided
August 28, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 580 Report and Recommendations, 479 Report and Recommendations,, 480 Report and Recommendations, 579 Report and Recommendations (Motion(s)258, 260, 259, 262 terminated)
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff Liorna Technologies Ltd. previously filed motions for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 258, 262) and Defendant Fortinet, Inc. previously filed motions for partial summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 259, 260, 261) and a motion to reconsider (Dkt. No. 554). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Reports and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 479, 480, 482, 542, 579, 580) on these motions. Lionra and Fortinet have now filed various Objections (Dkt. No. 508, 549, 553, 598).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case