Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2024)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 478
Decided
April 22, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 184 SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER filed by Fortinet, Inc
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Fortinet’s Motion for Leave to Amend its Answer. (Dkt. No 1 84.) Fortinet seeks to add a license defense. The license defense is based on certain Accused Products containing processors from Lionra licensees Intel and AMD. T he Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED as provided below. I. BACKGROUND On October 28, 2022, Fortinet filed its original Answer but did not include the license defense it now seeks to add. (Dkt. No. 30.) The Docket Control Order provides the deadline to amend pleadings as September 1, 2023. (See Dkt. No.