Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 480
Decided
April 23, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendant Fortinet’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §101 and Plaintiff Lionra’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 101. After consideration, the Court recommends finding none of the patents are invalid under §101 as provided below. I. APPLICABLE LAW Summary judgment should be granted “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a).