Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 2, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 238
Decided
February 2, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - granting in part; denying in part 151 MOTION for Leave to File to Supplement Invalidity Contentions
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Supplement Invalidity Contentions. (Dkt. No 151.) Having considered the motion, the Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART as provided below. I. BACKGROUND On February 10, 2023 defendants Fortinet, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (“Defendants”) served invalidity contentions identifying Cisco C atalyst 6000 Series as prior art to the ’436 and ’612 Patents and SRP MAC Layer Protocol as prior art to the ’630 Patent. (Mot.