Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 2, 2024)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Supplement Invalidity Contentions. (Dkt. No 151.) Having considered the motion, the Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART as provided below. I. BACKGROUND On February 10, 2023 defendants Fortinet, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (“Defendants”) served invalidity contentions identifying Cisco C atalyst 6000 Series as prior art to the ’436 and ’612 Patents and SRP MAC Layer Protocol as prior art to the ’630 Patent. (Mot.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error