Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 12, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00911, Dkt. No. 537
Decided
August 12, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Mot ion to Transfer Case 2:14- cv-912 to the Southern District of California (Dkt. No. 56 in Case No. 2:14- cv-911, “Motion to Transfer”). Defendants argue the Southern District of California is a clearly more convenient forum for Case No. 2:14- cv-912. (Dkt. No. 56 at 5.) 1 Plaintiff Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. (“Core”) opposes transfer. (Dkt. No.