Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 3, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00911, Dkt. No. 559
Decided
September 3, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics Mobil ecomm U.S.A., Inc’s (collectively “LG”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Exhaustion (Dkt. No. 273). Having fully considered the partie s’ briefing and arguments, the Court find s that LG has not satisfied the territoriality requirement of its exhaustion defense. 1 Accordingly, the motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. (“Core”) filed suit on September 26, 2014, alleging that thirteen of its patents are infringed by LG. (Dkt. No.