Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00911, Dkt. No. 247
Decided
November 5, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE GROUP 2 PATENTS
Length
53 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

REGARDING THE GROUP 2 PATENTS On September 3, 2015, the Court held a hearin g to determine the proper construction of disputed terms in the seven United States Pa tents: Patent Nos. 6,266,321 (“the ’321 Patent”), 6,978,143 (“the ’143 Patent”), 7,3 83,022 (“the ’022 Patent”), 7,599,664 (“the ’664 Patent”), 7,804,850 (“the ’850 Patent”), 8,165,049 (“the ’049 Patent”), and 8,792,398 (“the ’398 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). The Court, having considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos.