Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00911, Dkt. No. 541
Decided
August 16, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Core’s1 Brief for Construction of “Integer Multiple of the Current Air Interface Transmission Time Interval.” (Dkt. No. 524.) LG2 opposes Core’s request for further claim construction. (Dkt. No. 528.) I. LAW “When the parties present a fundamental dispute regarding the scope of a claim term, it is the court’s duty to resolve it.” O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Tech. Co., 521 F.3d 1351, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2008) .