Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00911 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2016)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00911, Dkt. No. 417
Decided
March 20, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 376, DENYING 284 DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation Denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (“Defendants’ Objections”) (Dkt. No. 386). On November 20, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice withdrawing any and all asserted claims pertaining to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,782,818; RE44,828; 5,946,634; 7,599,664; 7,529,271; 7,383,022; 7,072,667; and 5,907,823 (collectively “the Dropped Patents”). (Dkt. No. 266). Defendants filed a Motion to deem this withdrawal dismissal with prejudice under Fed.